Your Wishes

[Driadashop]

Gracias por contestar. . Efectivamente viene una ampolla de 1ml en cada peptido. Hay péptidos que si son de 10mg se ha de reconstituir con 2 ml y los stack de 30mg en adelante en 3ml y por eso lo decía. La verdad que pincharme cada día dos veces segun el péptido con una aguja más gruesa acabas perforado jaja pero ya lo tendré en cuenta. El grosor del tapón no la dureza si sería importante ya que cuando queda poco líquido se queda en los laterales y es muy difícil se apurar el vial.

Thanks, we’ll take that into account. Yes, right now the number of daily injections with peptides is much higher on average than the number of steroid injections per week

 

[jerem]

You would be the first to do this, and I think the idea is fantastic, but using multi-purpose 10-milliliter vials of testosterone or other derivatives isn't necessarily suitable for everyone.

Some protocols require the simultaneous administration of several molecules, and therefore multiple vials at once, at doses that aren't necessarily enormous. Sometimes, this is due to self-prescribed TRT, and the new trend of more frequent microinjections. For these reasons, the same vial is sometimes used for months. Over time, the oils become rancid, the benzyl alcohol can evaporate, and improper handling can render 10 milliliters unusable at once. With these smaller containers (between 2 and 10 ml), an increase in the price per milliliter would certainly be necessary due to higher manufacturing costs. The 1 ml ampoules would then become obsolete. This question may have already been raised. Other laboratories may have also already tested the concept. What are your thoughts? Thank you in advance.

 

[Driadashop]

You would be the first to do this, and I think the idea is fantastic, but using multi-purpose 10-milliliter vials of testosterone or other derivatives isn't necessarily suitable for everyone.

Some protocols require the simultaneous administration of several molecules, and therefore multiple vials at once, at doses that aren't necessarily enormous. Sometimes, this is due to self-prescribed TRT, and the new trend of more frequent microinjections. For these reasons, the same vial is sometimes used for months. Over time, the oils become rancid, the benzyl alcohol can evaporate, and improper handling can render 10 milliliters unusable at once. With these smaller containers (between 2 and 10 ml), an increase in the price per milliliter would certainly be necessary due to higher manufacturing costs. The 1 ml ampoules would then become obsolete. This question may have already been raised. Other laboratories may have also already tested the concept. What are your thoughts? Thank you in advance.

As I understand it, the discussion now is about producing oils in 2 ml vials, although earlier there was mention of caps for peptide vials.

If we’re talking about oils, producing them in 2 ml vials would likely require additional equipment and a significant amount of work, while the demand for such a product would probably remain quite low. I’m concerned that it simply wouldn’t be cost-effective, especially considering that the price per ml would increase.

In addition to that, there would be many technical challenges involved. If this were to become a clear market trend, we would of course take it into consideration. But to be honest, innovations in this industry often end up having negative outcomes.